Political parties fulfil an essential role in a representative democracy, creating a direct link between its people and the political system.
EUR-Lex is your online gateway to EU Law. It provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU legal documents. It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages and is updated daily.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance
Advancing democracy worldwide, as a universal human aspiration and an enabler of sustainable development, through support to the building, strengthening and safeguarding of democratic political institutions and processes at all levels.
Council of Europe; European Committee on Democracy and Governance (CDDG)
The European Committee on Democracy and Governance (CDDG) is the Council of Europe intergovernmental forum where representatives of the member States meet to develop European standards (recommendations, guidelines, reports), to exchange and follow up on the state of democratic governance in Europe, and to work together to strengthen democratic institutions at all levels of government.
Council of Europe, European Commission for Democracy through Law - Venice Commission
The role of the Venice Commission is to provide legal advice to its member states and, in particular, to help states wishing to bring their legal and institutional structures into line with European standards and international experience in the fields of democracy, human rights and the rule of law.(...).The Venice Commission is also working on the question of political parties and their funding, which play a fundamental role in democratic life.
Democracy and the Entanglement of Political Parties and the State: Party–State Relations in 20th-Century France, Italy, and Germany; Pepijn Corduwener; Comparative Political Studies; 2020; Volume 53; Issue 1; pp. 40–70
This article makes a plea for a historical turn in the study of party–state relations. Building on recent insights on the role of political parties in institution-making which have emerged in the historical sciences, it suggests that the deployment of a historical institutionalist perspective can tackle the difficulties in isolating the causal mechanisms and identifying empirical indicators of party–state entanglement, which stand at the foreground of political science studies into the contemporary crisis of democracy in the West. (...)
Presidential Elections and European Party Systems (1848–2020); Fernando Casal Bértoa, Till Weber; British journal of political science, 2024-07, Volume 54; Issue 3; pp.874-891
Political scientists have long been concerned that a popularly elected presidency may destabilize competitive party systems. We develop and test a new theory holding that the impact is more immediate and severe than previously assumed. Coexisting legislative and presidential coalitions first and foremost impede the evolution of predictable party interactions at the executive level, which is the domain of the cabinet. (…)
The Mobilizing Effect of Party System Polarization. Evidence From Europe; Fabio Ellger; Comparative political studies; 2024-07; Volume 57; Issue 8; pp.1310-1338
Does party system polarization mobilize voters? Polarization is increasingly shaping democratic competition across Europe. While often perceived to be negative, polarization can be an effective remedy against voter disengagement. This paper investigates two distinct, but often conflated mechanisms, which could explain why polarization leads to mobilization. Spatial polarization of parties diversifies electoral options at the ballot, while affective polarization mobilizes based on emotional considerations.(…)
Are party families in Europe ideologically coherent today?; Nicolas de la Cerda, Jacob R. Gunderson; European journal of political research, 2024-08; Volume 63; Issue 3; pp.1208-1226
Researchers classify political parties into families by their shared cleavage origins. However, as parties have drifted from the original ideological commitments, it is unclear to what extent party families today can function as effective heuristics for shared positions. We propose an alternative way of classifying parties based solely on their ideological positions as one solution to this challenge.
Political group formation in the European parliament: Negotiating democracy and gender; Petra Ahrens, Johanna Kantola ; Party politics, 2023-09, Volume 29; Issue 5; pp.817-828
Political group formation in the European Parliament (EP) after European elections is a core feature of supranational party politics. The research objective of this article is to scrutinise democratic practices and the role of values, more specifically gender equality, in this political group formation. Complementing extant literature, this article engages with gendered political group formation as a dynamic process consisting of three intertwined layers, which are assessed by analysing formal and informal institutions around democracy and gender. (...)
All about the money? A cross-national study of parties’ relations with trade unions in 12 western democracies; Elin Haugsgjerd Allern et al.; Party Politics; 2021; Volume 27; Issue 3; pp. 407–417
This article examines political parties’ approach to trade unions and the role of private and public party finance in contemporary democracies. We suggest that both unions’ direct donations and states’ party finance regimes may account for variation in the strength of parties’ organizational links to unions. We investigate this argument with a new data set covering parties historically aligned with trade unions and union confederations in 12 mature democracies. Our empirical analysis provides support for the hypothesis that financial contributions are positively associated with stronger organizational links but also suggests that this relationship is constrained by the level of public subsidies and state regulation of donations. The findings point to the need for more research on how private and public money affects parties’ interactions with civil society actors.
Political groups over national parties: Measuring the Europeanization of the political arena through MEPs Twitter interactions; Livia van Vliet, Juliana Chueri, Petter Törnberg, Justus Uitermark; Party politics; 2023
The question of the democratic character of the European Union (EU) has been a center-point of decades of political research. An important critique suggests that the development of the European political arena is still incomplete, with European parliamentarians primarily orienting themselves to national issues and politicians, implying a problematic mismatch between the political arena and their policy jurisdiction. Research has however been limited by methodological difficulties of capturing the level of Europeanization of the political arena. This paper contributes a novel method for measuring Europeanization by studying interactions from the European parliament to their national parliamentarians on Twitter in 15 EU countries. Contrary to expectations in the literature, we find substantial Europeanization of the political arena. The level of Europeanization furthermore varies greatly across countries and political groups. This has important implications on the debate on EU’s democratic deficit, as communication across different levels of parliament indicates democratic debate.
Eurosceptic, polarized or undecided? How party politicization may shape the structure of public attitudes towards European integration; Morgan Le Corre Juratic, Mariana Carmo Duarte; Alban Versailles
In
The Europeanization of Belgian parties: Both near and far?; Louise Hoon, Gilles Pittoors
In
Challenger Parties and Populism; Catherine E. De Vries, Sara B. Hobolt
In
No Money, No Party: The Role of Political Parties in Electoral Campaigns; Chiara Destri
In
Reconnecting European Political Parties with European Union Citizens, Steven van Hecke et al.; International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance; International IDEA Discussion Paper 6/2018
A smarter funding system for European parties; Louis Drounau; The Austrian Society for European Politics; 28 January 2021
Seventy years of transnational political groups in the European Parliament: Origins and trajectories; Wolfram Kaiser, Jürgen Mittag; Brefing; European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS); December 2023
The creation and formalisation of the European Parliament's political groups goes back to June 1953 and the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community's Common Assembly. This briefing analyses the evolution of the groups' structures and trajectories until the European elections in 2019. It shows how the conflict between national, political and transnational ideological allegiances of delegated Members of the Common Assembly was already present from the start, providing an important impetus for the formalisation of the political groups. This formalisation created the basis for the groups' key role in structuring the work of the Common Assembly and later of the European Parliament. The European Parliament's competence for its own budget meanwhile made the groups' formalisation imperative to allow the distribution of funds for office space, secretariats and policy-making resources. The structure and power distribution among the groups has remained relatively stable to the present day.
Towards a revision of the Regulation on the statute and funding of European political parties and foundations; Edoardo Bessanelli; Study; European Parliament; DG IPOL; March 2022
This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the AFCO Committee, provides an in-depth analysis of the key proposed changes to Regulation 1141/2014 on the statute and funding of European political parties and foundations. It assesses the extent to which the reformed regulation strengthens, as per art. 10(4) TEU, the capacity of Europarties to contribute to forming a European political awareness and expressing the will of EU citizens.
Statute and funding of European political parties under Regulation 1141/2014; Irmgard Anglmayer; Study; European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS); June 2021
European political parties are transnational political alliances made up of national parties from the same political family. Since July 2004, they have been able to receive funding from the EU general budget. The current Regulation 1141/2014, applicable since 2017, tightened the requirements for parties' recognition, funding and spending. Yet, some parties (and their affiliated foundations) found loopholes in the legal framework. Targeted amendments to the regulation adopted in 2018 and 2019 sought, inter alia, to prevent misuse of public funds, enhance the role of European parties in the European public space, and safeguard the integrity of the European elections by sanctioning breaches of the rules on the protection of personal data. This study examines the operation of the legal framework, ahead of the legislative revision announced by the European Commission in its 2021 work programme, and in support of the evaluation report currently undertaken by the AFCO committee.
European political parties and the European Council: A pattern of ever closer coordination?; Ralf Drachenberg; Study; European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS); April 2022
The role of the European political parties, often under-estimated in the past, has increased significantly over the years. Today, they are important coordinators within the EU political system, carrying out a variety of activities that can be classified conceptually as ‘vertical’, ‘horizontal’ and ‘diagonal’ coordination. This EPRS study explores the growing 'politicisation' of the European Council and the increased coordination role which European political parties appear to play in the context of the European Council. The parties’ main coordination activities are clearly their respective 'pre-summits', held just ahead of European Council meetings. These pre-summits serve multiple purposes for the parties – including coordinating positions for the imminent European Council discussions, long-term strategising, communication, socialising and networking – with the importance of each varying between the different parties. A case study looking at the nomination of the EU’s new institutional leadership in 2019 illustrates the importance of the European political parties’ role in coordinating between EU leaders in the European Council.
More from European Parliament Think Thank on Political Parties
The content of all documents contained in the Think Tank website is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work.
Legislative Train - Revision of Regulation on statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations
The ‘Legislative Train Schedule’ website – offering a detailed state-of-play on upcoming initiatives, legislative proposals and procedures already finalised, as well as issues blocked or files withdrawn – continues to present new European Commission initiatives using the railway image. The aim is to facilitate the followup by all Members, Parliament staff and a broader public audience of the legislative and non-legislative activity of the EU institutions.
The Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations has been established for the purpose of registering, controlling and imposing sanctions on European Political Parties and European Political Foundations pursuant to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations.
Les partis et l’Europe: Européanisation des programmes ou nationalisation des enjeux européens?; Emiliano Grossman, Simon Persico, Isabelle Guinaudeau; Politique européenne; 2019; Volume 64; pp. 56-85
Cet article s’interroge sur l’Européanisation de la compétition partisane. Depuis les années 1990, des débats ont émergé concernant l’effet de l’intégration européenne sur la vie politique nationale. Pendant longtemps, ces effets ont été considérés comme faibles, les clivages politiques nationaux parvenant à absorber les questions européennes dans le clivage gauche droite. Nous revenons ici sur ce débat en examinant la politisation des enjeux européens à travers leur traitement dans les programmes électoraux. Nous nous concentrons sur les programmes pour les élections législatives à partir d’un jeu de données nouveau relatif au profil thématique des discours programmatiques européens, constitués dans le cadre du Comparative Agendas Project. Nous montrons que l’hypothèse classique de l’absorption des enjeux européens par des clivages nationaux doit être modérée. Nos trois cas – l’Allemagne, la France et le Royaume-Uni – illustrent en effet des modalités de politisation des enjeux européens assez contrastés, avec une part très variable des « enjeux constitutifs » liés à l’architecture et à la légitimité de l’UE par rapport aux enjeux d’action publique. Cette recherche exploratoire confirme donc l’importance d’une prise en compte de la substance des problèmes politisés en lien avec l’intégration européenne.
L’argent en politique : Rémunération des élus et financements des partis en Europe; Frédéric Monier; Cahiers Jaurès; 2020; Volume 235-236; Numéro 1-2; pp. 3-13
L’introduction à ce dossier thématique sur la rémunération des élus constate que les enquêtes de première main, reposant sur des sources documentaires, font défaut dans la plupart des pays européens. La question, plus complexe que ce que l’on imagine, éclaire le rapport entre politique et argent, entre rémunération et projets démocratiques. Différentes configurations apparaissent. Dans le cas français, l’indemnité parlementaire créée en 1789, souvent caractérisée comme une norme démocratique, mérite une étude attentive, y compris en scrutant la genèse d’avantages matériels liés au mandat. Par contraste, la situation en Espagne est marquée par la prégnance d’une vision libérale et conservatrice de la fonction de député comme honneur. L’évolution amorcée au tout début du XIXe siècle, ensuite battue en brèche, ne put s’affirmer qu’avec la Deuxième République, après 1931. Enfin, l’étude du cas roumain montre une configuration différente : la rémunération des députés, instituée en 1866, n’y visait ni une plus grande ouverture des formes de sélection du personnel politique, ni la professionnalisation des acteurs. Il s’agissait plutôt d’un ressort financier « systémique ».
Partis de gouvernement et transformation des systèmes de clivages; Pierre Martin; Pouvoirs; 2021; Numéro 179; pp. 59-69
Si le déclin des partis de gouvernement en Europe occidentale depuis les années 1970 est pour une part lié à l’apparition de nouveaux enjeux et de nouveaux clivages, il résulte principalement du recul de la croissance économique, de l’augmentation des attentes de la population envers l’État et du développement de comportements contestataires. Ces transformations économiques et sociales ont fortement affaibli la capacité des gouvernants à prendre des décisions légitimes aux yeux des citoyens.
I partiti politici a livello europeo: verso una complessa genesi dell’organizzazione democratica interna; Carmen Ranalli; DPCE Online; 2021; [S.l.]; Volume 46; Number 1
European political parties: towards a complex genesis of internal democratic management. - The article analyzes the internal discipline of parties in Europe, in close relationship with national political parties and their crisis. The main steps are the EU representative model, the role of political groups and the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, also in its recent changes in orientation, and the events that have contributed to the strengthening of the European Parliament. The conclusions highlight the need for a revision of the internal discipline of national parties: this process, in addition to increasing the perception that citizens would have towards the parties themselves would also entail a strengthening of the European framework.
Partis politiques : Archives historiques des partis politiques numérisées et disponibles sur Gallica
The Robert Schuman Foundation that was founded in 1991 after the fall of the Berlin Wall has been approved by the State for its services to the public; it works to promote the construction of Europe. The Foundation is a reference research centre and develops studies on the European Union and its policies, promoting the content of these in France, Europe and elsewhere in the world. It encourages, contributes to and stimulates European debate thanks to the wealth of its research, publications and the organisation of conferences. (...)
The “Fondation pour l’innovation politique” (Fondapol) is a French think tank that has been contributing to pluralist thought and a renewal of public debate since its founding in 2004. We believe our democracy must increasingly rely on individual responsibility rather than government control. We are therefore determined to promote freedom in every area of public life. (...)
At the Jacques Delors Centre, academic research goes hand in hand with the development of concrete ideas for future-oriented EU policies.
Party Facts - a database of political parties worldwide
The Party Facts project is a gateway to empirical data about political parties and a modern online platform about parties and their history as recorded in social science datasets. It makes use of social media technologies to create a collaborative data infrastructure following an approach to collect data successfully applied by the Encyclopedia of Life (EOL).
Parties and Elections in Europe - the database about parliamentary elections and political parties, Wolfram Nordsieck
Parties and Elections in Europe provides a comprehensive database about political parties, elections and governments. The website contains the results of legislative elections from more than 100 countries and autonomous regions in Europe. The parties are classified according to their political orientation. Historical data can be found in the archive.
The Representative Democracy Data Archive (REPDEM)
REPDEM presents the comparative data collection efforts undertaken by various research and data infrastructure projects on governments, parliaments, political parties, length of government formation periods, bargain rounds, procedures and mechanisms for intra-coalition governance, and government duration and termination.
Books can be consulted upon request (sent to Library@europarl.europa.eu) at:
Info Hub Brussels
Esplanade Solidarność 1980,
B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
From Monday to Friday 9:00-18:00
+32 2 28 48077
EP Library catalogue will give you access to a large multilingual collection of information sources, focusing on European policies, law, economics and international relations. Find search results (open access) related to the subject of this guide.
By installing the Citizens' App, you’ll learn who does what in the EU, how all of this is relevant to your daily life and what challenges the EU faces, many of which will shape your future.
Have a question? Then simply contact the Ask EP service, which will provide an answer about the activities, powers and organisation of the European Parliament.
*Except for some images